446
submitted 1 week ago by moe90@feddit.nl to c/technology@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] atlien51@lemm.ee 8 points 1 week ago

WHY DONT WE HAVE A MAINSTREAM ALTERNATIVE YET

[-] amorangi@lemmy.nz 8 points 1 week ago

By operating youtube at a loss for many years Google acted anticompetitively to kill competition or stop competition arising. Now that they've achieved that they can do what they like. Don't feel bad using ad blockers against this anti-capitalist company.

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 4 points 1 week ago

Final stage of enshittification, now they are allowing more right wing propaganda than normal on the channel

[-] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 1 points 1 week ago

And suppression of comments, for all sorts of reasons. Words and phrases will constantly flag AI autoremoval.

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 3 points 1 week ago

FYI, this is currently happening with Uber.

[-] atlien51@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

I never felt bad abt that for a second. Like the thought never crossed my kind XD FUCK YOUTUBE!

[-] anas@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

I am in no way defending YouTube here, but how did it act anticompetitively?

[-] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Hosting and storage costs, few can afford to be an alternative to an absolutely gigantic video storage platform that costs obscene money to maintain.

[-] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago

I am causing a netloss to googs. I don’t pay for Google plus or whatever, and j don’t view their fucking ads. Win win if you ask me.

[-] glog78@digitalcourage.social 1 points 1 week ago
[-] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Sure, a service that manages an infinitely smaller amount of content and complexity. It is a situational tool, hardly a YouTube killer... the banner presented on the homepage professes that it's expensive to run and please donate.

[-] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

OK, so a bittorrent tracker site with a video player built in with comments underneath and you can get perks from content creators for seeding. Then of course some kind of voting system and etc. Then a creator can just get a seed box to start hosting their own videos.

[-] Tregetour@lemdro.id 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

People get proccupied with emulating YT, which is indeed cost prohibitive. But that response assumes one is emulating all of it. What about only pursuing sections of it to cater to particular audiences? Serving 100% of YT's video might be too much even for Amazon (for example) but what about 1%?

Why couldn't Amazon host Booktube? And the manga/anime enthusiasts and other varietes of weebs to go along with them? They already own ebook retail. A VOD service to chip off some of YT's viewership would be a more productive investment than The Rings of Power...

A YT competitor needs a bit of scale, sure, but not as much as YT itself. A fraction will do.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's a very difficult business model to make profitable without an already massive userbase. In fact, I think YT was actually losing money for Google for a while after they bought it. I could be misremembering though.

[-] atlien51@lemm.ee 0 points 1 week ago

Yes but not everything needs to make a profit, just not make a loss. Also it could be community supported with donations and stuff:)

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

YouTube was operating at a loss under Google for years. The only reason it is able to exist is because a massive entity like Google was able to absorb that without folding, and keep providing a free service until it becomes profitable (is it even yet? I'm not sure).

I mean fuck Google, and yes a big enough non-profit (or even government) could do it (probably better), but unfortunately that's not the world we live in right now.

[-] airportline@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 week ago

We do, but you probably don't like it (TikTok).

[-] atlien51@lemm.ee 0 points 1 week ago

You’re right :)

I meant idk something like Oddysse (but a website with actual moderation)

[-] ewenak@jlai.lu 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Do you know of PeerTube? It's not mainstream at all either, but it seems more known to me.

It's also in the fediverse, and isn't accused of the same moderation issues (though idk if PeerTube is really better than Odyssee at moderation, I suppose it's just a difference in policy).

Edit: I read a bit about it, and I can see I was wrong about Odyssee being less known than PeerTube. It's strange, I never heard of it, but anyway. Odyssee also includes some crypto bullshit, so yeah...

this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2025
446 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

71844 readers
2378 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS