61
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Davriellelouna@lemmy.world to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world

Only 3 states Delaware, Montana, and New Jersey raise enough revenue from cars to fully cover their highway spending

The remaining 47 states and the District of Columbia must make up the difference with tax revenues from other sources

By diverting general funds to roadway spending, the burden of paying for the roads falls on all taxpayers, including people who drive little or may not drive at all.

Source: https://taxfoundation.org/data/all/state/state-road-taxes-funding/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago

Kind of maddening that people who can't even afford to own a car have to pay for other people's car dependency, only to be yelled at for "not sharing the road" when they've got to get to work or school by bike.

[-] cole@lemdro.id 4 points 1 month ago

I think this goes both ways though. Obviously cars get more money, but there are lots of instances of taxpayers paying for public transit they cannot personally use.

[-] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 month ago

the thing about public transport is that you benefit from other people using it, i for one quite like having less traffic on the roads and less pollution in the air that i breathe

[-] PanGodofPanic@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago

The aggregate cost of public transit besides roads themselves is a rounding error against the aggregate cost of roads alone, nationwide. This is not a valid argument until that comparison is anywhere near peer.

[-] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com 1 points 1 month ago

That's how taxes work. Is it also insane people who don't go to school or have kids have their taxes funding their local districts and community colleges?

[-] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

Not the same, though.

The ROI on public education should be incentive enough to want your taxes going to it.

Encourageing car dependency creates losses across numerous categories, including health, environmental, further tax burden, public safety, land use, etc.

But my point was that the entitlement that some drivers have about "owning the road" is so toxic.

[-] kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

Don't most goods move by truck? You want your Amazon package don't you?

[-] MightBeFluffy@pawb.social 1 points 1 month ago

Switzerland requires all warehouses to have a rail connection. Semi trucks are not needed.

[-] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

Trains to move long distances, trucks for city to city transport, local deliveries can be made by smaller truck or cargo e-bikes.

No need to get rid of roads. We need to get rid of car dependency and make road use more equitable for all users.

[-] MisterOwl@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago

people who can’t even afford to own a car have to pay for other people’s car dependency

Those same people can STFU unless they want to waive all their rights to police protection, ambulance service, or fire department response.

[-] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 month ago

Explain.

Do police, ambulance, and fire need 4 lane stroads packed with gridlock, or 18 lane highways filled with traffic congestion to function properly?

We can have a working road system for emergency services, transport, and public transportation without the burden of car dependency.

[-] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 month ago

police protection lmao

if removing roads means the police can't get around then we should do it ASAP, it would save so many lives

[-] pdqcp@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Protected bike lanes / bus lanes / tramway can also be used by ambulances, fire department and police in case of emergency. They even have better response times due to not being stuck on car traffic

So yeah, I'd rather have my tax dollars being used in that kind of infrastructure, instead of only on car centric designs

[-] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Mr. Owl, how many libertarians does it take to solve a bear problem?

[-] MisterOwl@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

It depends.. black bear or brown bear? https://youtu.be/PYkWWnZm6-w

[-] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Drivers whining about bike lanes etc. can STFU first. Then, and only then, you might have had a point.

[-] ronigami@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Emergency services are paid for by property taxes. Completely independent of what kind of vehicle people do (or do not) use.

this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2025
61 points (94.2% liked)

Fuck Cars

12669 readers
577 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS