476
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] egerlach@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago

Not everyone has the luxury of the free time and effort to pay enough attention, and those people vote. I'm not suggesting absolving them of their individual responsibility. They contributed and they have to reckon with that. I'm suggesting that we recognise the role that the system they exist in plays, too. And that they're human which means they have all the failings that come along with that.

Do we hold Oppenheimer responsible for all the deaths the Manhatten Project caused? I argue we shouldn't, but he still had to personally reckon with the moral weight of it.

Two things can both be true: someone can have been part of the cause of injustice and join the fight for justice. We can both hold them accountable; and encourage their growth, offer them grace, and welcome them to the right side of history. We don't have to forgive, but mocking (at first) doesn't help IMO.

(As I've said elsewhere, no reservations about mocking the unrepentant)

[-] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

We don’t have to forgive, but mocking (at first) doesn’t help IMO...

Yeah, but we're on round 3 for people listening to trump's campaigns.

Also in case you missed it...

I can understand making the trump mistake once in 2016.

Honestly, it's gone so badly the last 3 rounds that I really think we ought to have a basic "in touch with reality test" and then weight votes based on whether people can answer objective true/false questions like... "The earth is a flat disc being accellerating upwards through space" and "Bacteria and Viruses are real, and can cause diseases."

this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2025
476 points (98.8% liked)

Leopards Ate My Face

9949 readers
69 users here now

Rules:

  1. The mods are fallible; if you've been banned or had a post/comment removed, please appeal.
  2. Off-topic posts will be removed. If you don't know what "Leopards ate my Face" is, try reading this post.
  3. If the reason your post meets Rule 1 isn't in the source, you must add a source in the post body (not the comments) to explain this. If the reason is in the source but is tedious to find (e.g. in a lengthy video), you must add an explanation for where it is.
  4. Posts should use high-quality sources (for a rough idea, check out this list), and posts should retain the title (if one exists) from works like news articles, videos, etc. You may (but need not) edit your post if the source changes the title. Other types of posts should have a title which accurately, relatively neutrally describes their contents.
  5. For accessibility reasons, an image of text must either have alt text or a transcription in the post body.
  6. Reposts within 1 year or the Top 100 of all time are subject to removal. Within moderator discretion, this doesn't just include reposts of the exact same media but also includes e.g. a secondary source telling basically the exact same story as another that was already posted.
  7. This is not exclusively a US politics community. You're encouraged to post stories about anyone from any place in the world at any point in history as long as you meet the other rules.
  8. All Lemmy.World Terms of Service apply.

Also feel free to check out:

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS