33
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Saleh@feddit.org 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I wonder if this is related to how ChatGPT and other models provided as a service have been filtered.

E.g. them being "forced" to be nice and more agreeable.

If that turns out to be the case, i'd wager that it is impossible to filter for every possible constellation and outcome as we have seen with people hacking through clever prompting in ever more sophisticated ways.

I find it particularly worrying that people without any prior signs of mental health issues got sucked into severe delusions and the article suggests that the "AI" being marketed as reliable and impartial is key to it. This means the companies behind will not address this fundamental misconception as their business model is built on it.

I dont see how these cases could be prevented without extreme regulatory intervention.

[-] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago

I don't see how these cases could be prevented even with regulation. It would take a massive change in how these things work on a fundamental level.

[-] Saleh@feddit.org 3 points 2 days ago

Regulations that make the companies in question fully liable for any damages that are incurred in using the product for instance. Or regulations that prohibit selling these to the general public, or requiring a human supervision at all times of use.

That's what i mean by

extreme regulatory intervention

As a consequence it would lead to fundamental changes in the products themselves.

this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2025
33 points (97.1% liked)

Hacker News

1780 readers
322 users here now

Posts from the RSS Feed of HackerNews.

The feed sometimes contains ads and posts that have been removed by the mod team at HN.

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS