731
How do i stop this kind of pop up from ever appearing again? Win10 (feddit.uk)
submitted 1 year ago by DrGonzo@feddit.uk to c/technology@lemmy.world
353 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Aatube@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Use Waterfox to confuse Windows and boost your performance

[-] OrdinaryAlien@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Waterfox has been bought by advertising and data analytics firm System1.

[-] Lunar@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Waterfox is no longer owned by System1, and there's no evidence System1 ever added analytics to Waterfox.

[-] OrdinaryAlien@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"In July 2023, Alex Kontos announced that Waterfox had been turned into an independent project again."

That's very recent, I didn't know.

I wouldn't use a browser bought by a shady company when there are good alternatives. I wouldn't want to support that company by using it.

[-] Lunar@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago

That's fair, but I get the feeling Waterfox wasn't very profitable for them to begin with.

I personally use it because it fills the very specific niche of re-enabling support for the legacy add-on format by default. You can do this in Firefox and other derivatives, but it's kind of a pain and it's easily undone by updates. I don't know of any alternatives that do the same thing.

[-] Thymos@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

legacy add-on format

What do you need that for?

[-] Lunar@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago

Tab groups like in the reply below, but also a number of other things such as a fully functional revival of DownThemAll (the webextension version still isn't as powerful), and a number of other useful addons from here.

Plus, I like to write my own complete themes, and it's far more convenient to package them into installable XPI files than it is to just use userChrome.css, since they can be easily distributed and updated automatically.

[-] Aatube@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago
  1. I don't care that much about privacy anyway. I don't really get why privacy geeks talk about Google collecting your searches while willingly keeping Mozilla telemetry (which is something W disables by default) on. What's the difference? I get why Google shouldn't be collecting external data but I have no issue at all with giving them the data I actually input. Plus Firefox has a lot more deals with bad privacy groups like Google, Fakespot, and Pocket.
  2. You can't make the assumption that they got worse on privacy just because they got bought. They're open-source, show me the code.
  3. Waterfox is said to be slightly faster. They also seem to have a lot more focus for development.
  4. Waterfox disables some of the Mozilla BS, like Pocket and that weird redesign of tabs to floating, by default.
this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2023
731 points (95.9% liked)

Technology

59583 readers
2499 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world