908
submitted 1 month ago by Gork@sopuli.xyz to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Azzu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago

Why is no one mentioning here that the business model shouldn't exist? If a copy can be made basically for free, there is no reason not to make it basically free. We should be providing everyone with the means to live regardless of their ability to sell stuff. If everyone was free to do whatever they please because their existence was provided for, people would still make media, because people love making things like that.

Of course that might mean that in the short term, while we don't do this, pirating might mean that some things stop existing. I'd be completely fine if all Hollywood movies and other shit disappeared overnight. Maybe then people would finally come to the understanding that our current model of doing things sucks.

[-] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago

Are you suggesting that all art should be free?

[-] Azzu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Eventually, yes. If everyone's needs are provided for, there is no requirement anymore to extract value from art, one can just make it and share it freely.

Copyright should be abolished.

[-] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 1 month ago
[-] iSeth@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Especially if the creator(s) is deceased.

Are you suggesting only the wealthy are deserving of art?

[-] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago

Only the wealthy can afford art? Music? Movies? Graphic Novels? Video Games?

Are you being obtuse?

[-] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

almost nobody can actually buy any of those, only a license

[-] Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

Capitalism is at the heart of your question. Art should be valued. Artists should be paid. Neither of those things requires capitalism or copyright laws. If as a society we funded artists properly none of this would an issue. The line that copyright is good for artists is total bullshit. It's a smokescreen that corporations use to prop up the system they created and benefit the most from.

[-] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago

Capitalism is definitely a major issue. I just don’t see how someone should not be compensated for work they perform, this includes art. Art can be free, but it shouldn’t have to be free. I think we may be saying similar things here.

[-] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago

the buisness model is essentially croud funding the movie after the movie is produced. Hollywood doesn't need the money, but triangle staff does.

this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2025
908 points (96.3% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

63297 readers
277 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS