151
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Halosheep@lemm.ee 40 points 1 year ago

One upside to the crazy rednecks in the US is that a bill like this would likely see a large uptick in Quran burnings.

Are the Danish generally supportive of something like this? I would be pretty upset about a harmless form of protest being banned because some people in another country were mad about it.

[-] huginn@feddit.it 16 points 1 year ago

I mean the Danish are the ones burning the books in front of foreign embassies. I think their opinions are mixed.

[-] deczzz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 year ago

The burning is being done by a couple of idiots who wants attention. It isn't something that happens on a regular basis, making the bill even more absurd.

[-] kense@lmmy.dk 1 points 1 year ago

Whaaaa.. Did you not perform your daily Bible Burning today? You should get your citizenship removed immediately!

[-] marcos@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I imagine the burning is mostly done by immigrants. I really doubt the Danish have reason to pick any one embassy, and most of them won't have a reason to think about the Koran.

[-] Diprount_Tomato@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Afaik this was all started by an Iraqi immigrant

[-] Notyou@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

I read he was a refugee. Small distinction, but it means he was escaping some sort of persecution which is why he was giving that status instead of immigrant. I would imagine he has strong feelings regarding based on his experience.

[-] kense@lmmy.dk 7 points 1 year ago

Danish chiming in, and while I can't speak for all my countrymen we discussed the topic at work yesterday.

Everyone I talked to had the same mixed feelings.

No, we shouldn't cater to the religious groups who wants to limit free speech because they get offended over someone burning their copy of a religious book.

No, anyone shouldn't burn religious books in public to incite hate and publicly display their (stupid ass) racism.

A quote from a Danish rapper, made some years ago, is currently trending

If we want to show people of the Middle East how great "freedom of expression" is, maybe we shouldn't use it to mock people who don't have it.

So, conclusion is we are torn..
Common conclusion was that everyone should be allowed to burn anything that is legal to burn on their own property. When you take that action into the public, it's okay that it's regulated..

If it's okay that that regulation only applies to religious books... don't know.

[-] seejur@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

If this law passes, it will only galvanize more and more restriction. Never seen an extremist who took a finger and then didn't ask for the whole arm.

[-] kense@lmmy.dk 1 points 1 year ago

I hear what you are saying, but I'm from Denmark.. these types of law suggestions usually come when there's a focus on something, not when there's a fear of something.

The government proved during the Mohammad-drawings that they will not bend over when they are outnumbered, so I'm not too concerned that these new laws are based on fear, rather than common sense.. if suddenly the Middle East should focus on circumcision of girls is not allowed in Denmark, I don't think that would be something we suddenly would allow (and here's to me hoping that we'll soon save all the boy penises out there!)

[-] gmtom@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah this is basically my thought and the thoughts of people I talk to as well. Both sides of the argument have merit and both are kinda shit, but ultimately, if you want your freedom of expression to be left alone don't purposely push the boundaries of it and use it to be a dickhead.

[-] deczzz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago

I wouldn't say generally, no.

this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2023
151 points (95.8% liked)

World News

38563 readers
2560 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS