221
Replaced (reddthat.com)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Landless2029@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

AI should have been used to do work for us to give us more time for art. Not the other way around...

[-] Animated_beans@lemmy.world -3 points 1 week ago

The flip side is that AI being able to create art democratizes art so that anyone with an idea can execute it. I don't need to have a steady hand to make a drawing of the idea I have and I don't need to be a software expert- I can describe what I want and what message I'm trying to convey and when the AI produces what I had imagined, I can share it with the world.

[-] redwattlebird@lemmings.world 4 points 1 week ago

What does 'democratise art' even mean? It's not like everyone votes for a specific generated AI image.

Anyway, I think what you mean is Socialism, in terms of AI making 'skills' available for everyone.

But it's not. It's stealing your capability to learn and taking it for itself without paying you for your efforts. Every input you use trains the model. Even though you're not creating art, you're still creating a prompt and you should be paid for your labour.

It's already been said by the operators of this massive scam. They can only operate via theft.

[-] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

AI produces what I had imagined

nope. AI is producing what AI imagined. It is not some kind of magic brain reading machine and never will be. I'd rather see palsy-drawn shaky line stick figures than midjourney six finger abominations any day.

By choosing the path of least resistance you're cheating your own creativity and robbing the world of yet another human voice.

And training the machines to take other artists jobs.

Cute.

democratise art?

that's the most stupid thing I've heard.

everyone can do art, grab a pencil and a paper, or clay, or a stick and a knife, or....

Doing art is practically free. you cant have anything more democratised than art.

AI is simply not art, it is inherently unable to do anything creative and only makes cheap soulless slop.

If it's used as a fancy brush, an artist can do amazing stuff with it, but the creativity and art still comes from the artist, not AI itself.

[-] Dogiedog64@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Or you could pick up a pencil and put it to paper, actually expressing what's in your soul through your own efforts. I know which one I'd prefer to look at.

Also, saying AI "Democratizes art" ignores several million years of people making art with whatever was on hand, whether that be 3D modeling software, or charcoal on a cave wall. Art has always been Democratic and Free; AI, notably, isn't.

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yeah my artwork isn't the greatest https://billsaquarium.com/ but it's my artwork and can tell the stories I want to tell.

Also AI can't make original painting like the kind my wife paints. It's all digital.

[-] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

man we're all gonna be plastic crap eventually! dig the comic.

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Thank you, this is an arch with the plastic diver, so follow along for a new one coming out tomorrow. And if follow Patreon you get them way sooner.

[-] boonhet@sopuli.xyz -1 points 1 week ago

I'm gonna get downvotes again, but: no I couldn't. Art class was mandatory for 9 years of school for me and I can still only draw shit with straight lines. Using a ruler. I can't do anything with a "free hand" as the teacher called it. If I had a project that required art on even a 3rd grade level I could choose between AI and hiring a person I can't afford.

That said, I hate what it does to professional artists. And luckily I don't have time to go through with the video game I wanted to create so I don't have to choose between AI and a real human with actual creativity right now.

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

You don't have to draw perfect art. I make a webcomic and it's not all straight lines shit. But it's true art that I did myself no AI needed.

Example

[-] Dogiedog64@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Motherfucker I don't give a fuck whether you're a professional artist or a literal child drawing the most dogshit scribbles imaginable, I STILL prefer that over the most refined AI Slop that could possibly be generated. Its not ABOUT the technical skill on display, it's about the sheer fact that YOU, a REAL, PHYSICAL PERSON, picked up the tools and decided to TRY. That alone is what's worthy of commendation, not the fact that AI can shit out generically hot anime waifus in .0032 seconds.

[-] Sp00kyB00k@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

No it is not. Because at some point it is paywalled. That's not democraticed. That is blitzscaled.

[-] Shmandom@feddit.uk 1 points 1 week ago

Or at least a crappy version of it, for the low price more pollution and unemployment.

[-] Cherries@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Beethoven composed music while deaf and you are complaining about not having steady hands. If you really want to make art, just start doing it. It really is that simple.

[-] Landless2029@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

When I had a good idea for art I wanted for personal use I went to fiverr and paid someone to do it for me. AI is killing the already meager income streams of starving artists.

[-] Smoogs@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You misspelled plagiarism. Ai learned from stealing.

And as for art:

….

Actually , you know what? I’m not going to touch this. I’d rather watch you fail than help you learn via criticism. So You go head and call whatever you think you’re doing ‘art’ all you want.

No other real artist touch this one either. Save the criticism and lessons for real artists. Let this one fail on their own.

[-] Goretantath@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

Humans learn by copying other artists too.

[-] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

AI isn't a person. It's just a bunch of numbers that get multiplied with an input.

To make those numbers a real person steals everyone's art and find out which set of numbers best copies that art.

It's pure theft, if you only feed it a few comics it will recreate them as perfectly as a photocopier. The magic is that if you feed it enough art it's copies become less authentic to the original (although sometimes still almost identical) so people feel like it's an "artist making new art" instead of a broken copy machine. Then you slap a name like "AI Model" on the copyright infringement machine and you can sell a subscription for 30$/month so any moron can copyright infringe. Best part is they take the liability!

What a great money making deal, and you can kill the environment all at the same time!

[-] Smoogs@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yup yup Leonardo totally got sued by the first person who made a cave painting for plagiarism.

Great logic.

Go huff your own farts some more, troll bait.

this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2025
221 points (97.0% liked)

Comic Strips

18600 readers
481 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS