15

Total noob to this space, correct me if I'm wrong. I'm looking at getting new hardware for inference and I'm open to AMD, NVIDIA or even Apple Silicon.

It feels like consumer hardware comparatively gives you more value generating images than trying to run chatbots. Like, the models you can run at home are just dumb to talk to. But they can generate images of comparable quality to online services if you're willing to wait a bit longer.

Like, GPT OSS 120b, assuming you can spare 80GB of memory, is still not GPT 5. But Flux Shnell is still Flux Shnel, right? So if diffusion is the thing, NVIDIA wins right now.

Other options might even be better for other uses, but chatbots are comparatively hard to justify. Maybe for more specific cases like code completion with zero latency or building a voice assistant, I guess.

Am I too off the mark?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Toes@ani.social 5 points 1 day ago

Framework has an AI machine on the market.

I haven't used it myself but perhaps it's worth looking into for your project.

https://frame.work/gb/en/desktop?tab=machine-learning

[-] rkd@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

I'm aware of it, seems cool. But I don't think AMD fully supports the ML data types that can be used in diffusion and therefore it's slower than NVIDIA.

[-] domi@lemmy.secnd.me 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Slower? Yes. But the alternative to a Framework Desktop for home use is a 30-40k Nvidia GPU, so I'm fine with slow.

Not to mention that it is more than fast enough for common use cases: https://github.com/geerlingguy/ollama-benchmark/issues/21#issuecomment-3164570956

[-] rkd@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

For image generation, you don't need that much memory. That's the trade-off, I believe. Get NVIDIA with 16GB VRAM to run Flux and have something like 96GB of RAM for GPT OSS 120b. Or you give up on fast image generation and just do AMD Max+ 395 like you said or Apple Silicon.

[-] Toes@ani.social 2 points 1 day ago

I wonder if that's a limitation of mesa?

Could it be possible with amdvlk?

[-] pepperfree@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

Lots of developer choose to write in CUDA as ROCm support back then is a mess.

load more comments (2 replies)
this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2025
15 points (89.5% liked)

LocalLLaMA

3514 readers
232 users here now

Welcome to LocalLLaMA! Here we discuss running and developing machine learning models at home. Lets explore cutting edge open source neural network technology together.

Get support from the community! Ask questions, share prompts, discuss benchmarks, get hyped at the latest and greatest model releases! Enjoy talking about our awesome hobby.

As ambassadors of the self-hosting machine learning community, we strive to support each other and share our enthusiasm in a positive constructive way.

Rules:

Rule 1 - No harassment or personal character attacks of community members. I.E no namecalling, no generalizing entire groups of people that make up our community, no baseless personal insults.

Rule 2 - No comparing artificial intelligence/machine learning models to cryptocurrency. I.E no comparing the usefulness of models to that of NFTs, no comparing the resource usage required to train a model is anything close to maintaining a blockchain/ mining for crypto, no implying its just a fad/bubble that will leave people with nothing of value when it burst.

Rule 3 - No comparing artificial intelligence/machine learning to simple text prediction algorithms. I.E statements such as "llms are basically just simple text predictions like what your phone keyboard autocorrect uses, and they're still using the same algorithms since <over 10 years ago>.

Rule 4 - No implying that models are devoid of purpose or potential for enriching peoples lives.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS