282
submitted 2 months ago by pdqcp@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/opensource@lemmy.ml

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/51038205

What are your thoughts? Any counter-counter points to the author's response to most concerns regarding open source?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

I would like to see a commonly used "Not Free For Corporations" license. Something a bit like the GPL; this is my copyrighted code, I'm offering the source code for others to examine, use, modify, redistribute, if you redistribute it it must have these same license terms. I would add it is free of charge for personal, educational, and small business commercial use, it is available on a per instance subscription basis for corporations. My work may not be used for the profit of shareholders unless I get a hefty piece of that pie.

[-] chebra@mstdn.io 2 points 1 month ago

@captain_aggravated @HiddenLayer555 but those things exist, of course. And they have a name: "Proprietary"

this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2025
282 points (98.3% liked)

Open Source

41324 readers
66 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS