96
submitted 3 days ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 40 points 3 days ago

It’s self serving, of course. China doesn’t want to continue its dependence on foreign fossil fuels. Any country that’s an energy importer should be thinking the same way.

Once built, clean energy tends to be cheap on a per-kWh basis.

[-] Flamekebab@piefed.social 26 points 3 days ago

Investing in infrastructure is rarely a bad idea.

[-] compostgoblin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 3 days ago

Meh, as long as they’re building it, whatever gets them to do it is fine with me. I care less about their motivation than I do about keeping as much fossil fuel in the ground as possible

[-] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 days ago

I fully agree. Meanwhile USA is drill baby drill

[-] compostgoblin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 days ago

Yep, and it’s a stupid ass decision. Even if you bought into the idea that America needs to be dominant in the energy sector for the next century, they’re completely ceding that position to China. The future of energy is not in combustion, it’s in renewables. And America seems to have no desire to lead the world on that front

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

I'm no tankie, but I've been saying for well over a decade, the 21st century is China's century. It's just history. America has fallen, China has been rising, and China has been planning and governing for a decades-long uprising.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 10 points 3 days ago

Their self serving behavior vs our chad energy independence

I like that argument. however the only country which is below china in the list of net oil exporter is the US.

which invalidates it.

but sure. US is its own shitshow itself.

[-] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I think it’s coal that they’re really trying to get off of.

Also I think the further down the list you go, the more the country is dependent on imports. SA is the top, they export the most; China is a net importer. Isn’t it?

[-] Takapapatapaka@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

You're right, from what the import list at the bottom of the shared article says, China is the first country in terms of strict importation (nearly twice the US).

this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2025
96 points (92.9% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

7393 readers
331 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS