The opposition to id cards themeselves in this country is very strange to me. Most civilised countries have some sort of national identification number/card that can be used to access government services, and having worked inside the UK government, I can tell you what a total nightmare it is to develop services for Britons without such a unique id.

What kills me, is that inevitably the id card debate here seems to focus in on the existence of a card rather than what the government wants to attach include with it, like biometric data, or pairing it with an app with invasive permissions. You need an id number for me so that I can be identified when accessing government services, you don't need to keep a record of every time I boarded a train or more surveillance nonsense.

This country is so used to government surveillance that they automatically assume that "id card means more tracking" rather than objecting to the tracking that already exists (have you seen Oxford Street?) and opposing an id that'd save the country mountains of cash and hassle if used properly.