427
I'm not sure, but it might be something about UUIDs
(lemmings.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2025
427 points (99.1% liked)
Programmer Humor
27720 readers
136 users here now
Welcome to Programmer Humor!
This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!
For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.
Rules
- Keep content in english
- No advertisements
- Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Shouldnt it be
return UUID { uuid: uuid.uuid }?I think it would make more sense AND more uuid per UUID
The first UUID is a local type, the second is the name of an embedded struct, the third is the name of the variable.
The struct looks something like this (writing this on my phone)
type UUID struct { uuid.UUID }
So, basically, this is a custom wrapper for a third party UUID implementation.
Ahh, that makes sense then
I'm assuming it's a map/dictionary notation here, rather than a type hint