71
submitted 1 week ago by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

And y'all think violence isnt the answer? That is literally all their monkey brains can comprehend

[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
[-] PKscope@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

Yeah? Well I say we make him cream his diaper. It's way past time to fight fire with fire. Give them what they seem to crave. The current response is not sufficient.

[-] Taleya@aussie.zone 1 points 1 week ago

To these cunts a lack of retaliation is seen as assent.

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

If even a quarter of those doors had someone returning buck shot this would probably be the last ice raid like that.

[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Maybe. They would likely call in heavier reinforcement if that became common. Solo fighters stand little chance of making a dent in them even when properly trained and armed. Sadly, that is a situation too many face given so many are so vehemently against violence of any kind. Maybe my ideas are colored by the media and there are more willing to go visceral than the media wants us to believe

[-] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You're 100% right.

They're targeting Democratic cities with large numbers of democratic gun owners because they're hoping for a confrontation.

It might be inevitable, but I guarantee you they will not back down once you give them what they have been trying to incite.

There's a reason Miller, Hegseth, and Bondi made an appearance, got all those armed people pumped full of adrenaline, and then literally slipped out the back door yesterday before flying far, far away. They don't plan on being present on the battlefield for the war they're creating.

They need people to fight and die while they give orders and watch comfortably from afar like it's some kind of UFC ultimate match.

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

These cops are functionallly bullies, it they realized there was real danger it would stop them. They've been avoiding anything actually dangerous for a reason. They might be able to call in a swat team for assistance, but it would destroy their ability to do widespread raids if there was legitimate fear for their own safety.

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago

they are also targeting on blue areas, and not red ones.

[-] Medic8teMe@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 week ago

It's quite unreal to watch from the outside what's happening down there. Violence is the only answer.

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago

it always was, but the right through various propaganda, said only protest without violence was the answer.

[-] humanamerican@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 week ago

And what do you expect us to achieve other than getting ourselves killed?

General strike is the only answer.

[-] Jarix@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Then start talking to your neighbours.

"Hey neighbour, it looks like we are in danger, what do you need from me? What are we gonna do when these fucks comes for us, our family and our friends?"

Like stop pretending this can't happen to anyone at this point. Because it's not going to get any better anytime soon

[-] humanamerican@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

Yes, this exactly.

this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2025
71 points (97.3% liked)

News

32741 readers
809 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS