22
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org 1 points 2 days ago

I do not agree. I think the main characteristic is use of side-effect-free functions, which the article illustrates nicely.

Of course it will be "more functional" if you write in Clojure or Scheme. Or go hardcore with Haskell. But as John Carmack wrote, you can practice functional programming in C++:

http://sevangelatos.com/john-carmack-on/

[-] cgtjsiwy@programming.dev 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Very few languages (or programmers!) are able to check that a function doesn't have side effects. In particular, checking that a function doesn't diverge generally requires a proof assistant, like in F* and Lean.

Your definition of functional programming is as valid as any, but it's so strict that even Haskell would be mid-tier in the functional ranking.

this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2025
22 points (92.3% liked)

Programming

23074 readers
150 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS