I'm not, and the poster doesn't seem to be, saying this isn't some sort of retaliation for saying Charlie Kirk did some bad things. The Trump admin does do plenty of that. But a lot of posts are saying it's definitive when it's not. At the very least, based on how the law seems to be still enforced, they need some sort of pretext. The poster at least takes some time to address that instead of screaming loudly with certainty about an uncertain situation where we have pretty partial information.

Slightly off topic, I went looking for court documents instead of news articles but failed to find anything.