24
lazy ass
(slrpnk.net)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2025
24 points (100.0% liked)
Microblog Memes
10008 readers
294 users here now
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
Rules:
- Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
- Be nice.
- No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
- Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.
Related communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Last time I applied for a job, I applied for 3 jobs, landed 2 interviews, got into the second round for both and took the one that matches the most with what I wanted and paid well.
Applying to 100+ jobs just sounds like spray and pray. This was admittedly 6 years ago and not in the US, but still if you already have experience it shouldn't be that hard.
Also admittedly, for my first job I applied for 30+ positions, getting into the second round once. After that I took a break from applying because I wanted to study up on how to actually land a job. After reading about how to conduct yourself in a job interview, I applied again and landed the first job I applied to.
All that to say that there is a certain skill required for applying and interviewing. Probably a hugely unpopular opinion here, but I stand by it.
That's how it used to be for me too, something has changed. Before this current job search, I'd never put out more than 4 applications to get a job. Now I've put out dozens (I refuse to spray and pray), and am still unemployed 6 months later.
The signal-noise ratio is too low nowadays that even genuine talent is purged.
Ive met too many colleagues who just arbitrarily filter out candidates because there's too many resumes that get past the automation.
The problem I have identified is that the people and or systems who do initial screening don't really know what they should be screening for.
You might have a real technical position that you need to fill requiring like archaic engineering knowledge. Then they do the screen and remove everyone who doesn't have a resume polished to whatever the latest MBA format is. Which removes a bunch of weirdos that are perfect for the job (because let's be real, it requires a strange skill set) and you are left with a bunch of candidates that can talk out of their ass perfectly, but don't actually have the knowledge or skills needed.
Then you get this bubbly Kevin who is good at communication when you really need Kwame who just wants to be left alone working on the technical problems.
That's true, being an effective technical interviewer to really sus out bs vs skill is hard. It's not just asking some rote set of questions, which often time are easy to rehearse answers for, but rather trying to get into the interviewee's mindset when you give them a scenario and assessing thought process rather than effective communication.
That sounds like the hiring manager joke about throwing away half the resumes because you don't want someone unlucky getting hired.
Not a very funny joke for unemployed people
Once you have experience in a field you should have recruiters knocking down your door. At least thats my experience in a pretty niche industry.