63
submitted 5 months ago by jwr1@kbin.earth to c/rust@programming.dev
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 3 points 5 months ago

The non-strict versions also panic by default, but only in debug mode. So if you were willing to use abs() you should be willing to use strict_abs().

Arguably a bit of a mistake to have the "obvious" function names be surprisingly unsafe, but I guess it's too late to fix that.

[-] flying_sheep@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago

I think this is where safety and performance are actually in conflict.

I think guaranteeing a panic leads to much worse code gen in this case.

[-] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 1 points 5 months ago

Yes that's true, but the point is you should have to opt in to surprising or risky behaviour.

this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2025
63 points (100.0% liked)

Rust

7922 readers
9 users here now

Welcome to the Rust community! This is a place to discuss about the Rust programming language.

Wormhole

!performance@programming.dev

Credits

  • The icon is a modified version of the official rust logo (changing the colors to a gradient and black background)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS