10
submitted 5 months ago by cm0002@lemmings.world to c/rust@programming.dev
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] alex_is@infosec.exchange 0 points 5 months ago

@TehPers @cm0002 I guess I can somewhat empathize with the author. But you're right, the author seems to be frustrated that some things are inherently complex. Though, Rust has terrific documentation and a lot of literature to get enough understanding to where things aren't necessarily runes anymore, but rich in meaning.
I will say though, does nalgebra require custom derive macros? If you need to parse ast on the regular to use a library, I can definitely agree with his point on complexity.

[-] TehPers@beehaw.org 1 points 5 months ago

I'm not aware of any custom derives needed to use nalgebra. I've never needed to write any. At most, I've written macro_rules! macros to help with trait impls, but not specifically for nalgebra.

I'm not too sure what the author is referring to there.

this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2025
10 points (85.7% liked)

Rust

7919 readers
7 users here now

Welcome to the Rust community! This is a place to discuss about the Rust programming language.

Wormhole

!performance@programming.dev

Credits

  • The icon is a modified version of the official rust logo (changing the colors to a gradient and black background)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS