79
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2023
79 points (100.0% liked)
LGBTQ+
6189 readers
7 users here now
All forms of queer news and culture. Nonsectarian and non-exclusionary.
See also this community's sister subs Feminism, Neurodivergence, Disability, and POC
Beehaw currently maintains an LGBTQ+ resource wiki, which is up to date as of July 10, 2023.
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
If they took out the "gay sex" and the "by death" parts, it would almost sound like a reasonable general rule.
You think someone should be locked up for "repeat offenses" of having sex? Is that reasonable?
That's why I said "almost". Like, "repeat offenses" on itself is nonsense, but "repeat offenses" + "spreading an illness", should probably get the "aggravated" treatment.
The law's authors are motivated by homophobia, not public health.
I doubt suggesting tweaks is a good use of time and efforts. It should simply be opposed , and its authors shamed.
I was thinking more in the line that they seem to have taken some reasonable law, and modified it to fit their motives.
The authors are definitely homophobic, and the missionaries who gave them the idea, who keep praising these changes, should be equally shamed.