61

She studied the influence of MAST cells on the brain.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 months ago

Who cares if he's only 19? He just murdered someone by his own will. He needs to be locked up at a minimum

[-] Rhaedas@fedia.io 8 points 2 months ago

The higher charge would be some degree of manslaughter, not murder, unless you know of evidence that he planned to do this.

[-] pc486@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

Involuntary manslaughter doesn't require premeditation or planning.

[-] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

I'm sure he got in his car and thought: "Today's a good day to murder someone". Or maybe you mean he thought: "I see someone crossing the street, let's murder her".

There's no mention of ill intent. There is mention of bad lighting and bad road design. Seems like the guy is guilty of not being extra careful enough in a risky road situation, but why was there a risky road situation near a university in the first place?

[-] Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago

When you choose to drive unsafely, you choose to drive with intent to kill.

[-] limer@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago

There is a firm correlation between not wanting to murder others and driving carefully.

And while there are unfortunate accidents, the vast majority of pedestrian and cyclist deaths are caused by arseholes

[-] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago

Not accidents, collisions.

All automotive collisions are avoidable. In this case, it sounds like the driver was at fault. The road designers were at fault and probably politicians are also at fault.

[-] PedestrianError@towns.gay 1 points 2 months ago

@limer @Fredthefishlord But many of those arseholes aren't driving, they're sitting in offices designing dangerous streets or vehicles.

[-] Mediocre_Bard@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

He didn't commit a murder because he didn't plan to murder her. Accidents aren't murder and not everyone is to survive the day.

[-] yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago

Correct. Killing is allowed if you do it at random with an SUV.

[-] Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Did the traffic engineer who created an intersection leading to death commit murder or manslaughter?

What about further traffic engineers who reuse this exact intersection knowing it leads to death?

[-] Soulg@ani.social 1 points 2 months ago

Unhinged take, you clearly don't even know what will means. It's a tragic accident

this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2025
61 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

14783 readers
112 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS