28
I do not understand these terms.
(lemmy.world)
Whether you're a seasoned pro or the noobiest of noobs, you've found the right place for Linux support and information. With a dedication to supporting free and open source software, this community aims to ensure Linux fits your needs and works for you. From troubleshooting to tutorials, practical tips, news and more, all aspects of Linux are warmly welcomed. Join a community of like-minded enthusiasts and professionals driving Linux's ongoing evolution.
I'll TLDR the answers you've gotten already: Stick to systemd. It works.
..because beyond that I think the debate of systemd is mostly astrology at this point: Systemd is basically what handles startup and monitoring of services on your PC. It has largely replaced the older initd on most systems.
Systemd was somewhat controversial when it was first adopted by many distros as it was seen as bloated compared to initd, plus it was a fundamental shift in how services were handled.
Today it is a mature system and while it still has its detractors, I think it mainly comes down to astrology and elitism. Personally I've used both for ages, and it's fine. So was initd. I just wish DNS wasn't rolled into systemd, but I don't care that hard, though.