[solved] Why is there no .gz.tar? (lemmy.zip)

submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip to c/linuxquestions@lemmy.zip

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A .tar archive is basically only the files cat'ed together, with a header and index added, right?

And a .tar.gz takes forever to modify, because it needs to first extract the .tar.

So why is there no archive format that just cat'es the compressed files together?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 12 points 2 months ago

TAR is short for Tape ARchive. It was originally meant to be written to magnetic tapes. Like cassette tapes. As such they are not really meant to be changed much. You read the whole thing from beginning to end until you find what you're looking for.

Modifying it would usually mean writing the whole thing again. So that is more a modern notion.

this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2025

27 points (96.6% liked)

Linux Questions

3710 readers

14 users here now

Linux questions Rules (in addition of the Lemmy.zip rules)

stay on topic
be nice (no name calling)
do not post long blocks of text such as logs
do not delete your posts
only post questions (no information posts)

Tips for giving and receiving help

be as clear and specific
say thank you if a solution works
verify your solutions before posting them as facts.

Any rule violations will result in disciplinary actions

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip