51

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/39628579

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] DonLongSchlong@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 month ago

I don't think most people here are petite (not petty btw) bourgeoisie.

Are you thinking of the "middle class" (higher earners) and their false consciousness maybe?

[-] haui@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 1 month ago

It depends on your definition. I personally have let go of the idea that someone in the west who owns considerable sums is a proletarian.

Most people who have a bachelors degree and upwards are much less dependent on their income as they think/let on.

Especially those whose boomer parents have paid houses and cars and can easily leave a sum of 100k plus have considerable loss to be feared if capitalism is ever to fall.

I absolutely despise the term middle class as it is a reactionary term used to divide the working class.

For me, working class is someone who has to work every day, take their 20 days vacation and otherwise will starve/freeze to death soon.

The ones who have stock, private healthcare, private pensions, yada yada are not strictly working class. Their reactionary potential is huge and they will fall for opportunism more often than not.

Being of a working class background, I know the cruel differences and privilege blindness of the petty bourgois people. They think everyone can have a univerdity degree or just open up a company but thats bullshit. And to make them understand that is a huge task.

[-] demerit@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 1 month ago

Proletarian is a relation to labor not entirely about how much money you make at the end of the month, otherwise Doctors & Lawyers would be "the same" as Small Bussiness tyrants. It also depends on the county, Education in Germany is heavily class segregated, social sciences for example are completely unavailable to most proletarians, as are law & medicine for example. This is different in other countries, like america where most of the people who have a bachelor or even a master, work dead-end service jobs.

Higher educated proles & union leaderships/bureaucrats are the classical labor aristocracy, and their tie to the system (They have something to loose) breeds opportunism. They are still proletarians, as are high-earning doctors, despite it all. Though I am of the opinion that the overemphasis on the treatler discourse often veers into leftcom territory and often seems to me like an intellectualized excuse to "do nothing" by local leftists. Mao even stated that downwards trending intellectuals/labor aristocrats are prime material for radicalization.

Who is and who is not proletarian is not mystical and ought to be not so hard to decipher, and if it is, then maybe one has went down the wrong road, on a theory basis.

[-] haui@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 month ago

I get your points i think.

But you do realize that you're contradicting yourself kind of.

Doctors and lawyers are, by their system designed high income and status, labour aristocracy and work against the proletariat.

Yes, they are technically workers but they do not understand the first thing about bring a prole.

Most leftists I met who think it is important if you technically are wage dependant are of that kind themselves and try to apologize their own privilege instead of facing it.

I do not view people with capital as proles. Feel free to cite theory to convince me otherwise but so far i'm quite convinced that a prole does not own shit.

[-] Maeve1@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 month ago

NGL, seeing the libopedia entry on he bear of various state PTO laws broke me.

[-] darkernations@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I guess it depends how on one classes "self-employed" - still wouldn't be the majority but it could be potentially 15% of the population.

(Petty is just the anglicised form. I have no loyalty to the French)

The better heuristic is to consider the revolutionary potential; how much value is given to private property and how much one benefits from the fall of the US empire. It cuts like a knife through warm butter and better illuminates which parts of the labour aristocrats, western proleteriat and the petite borugoisie to target.

https://redsails.org/stalins-shoemaker/

[-] DonLongSchlong@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

(Petty is just the anglicised form. I have no loyalty to the French)

Haha fair. Never seen someone use "petty" over "small"

The better heuristic is to consider the revolutionary potential; how much value is given to private property and how much one benefits from the fall of the US empire. It cuts like a knife through warm butter and better illuminates which parts of the labour aristocrats, proleteriat in the west and the petite borugoisie to target.

https://redsails.org/stalins-shoemaker/

Agreed. Also, nice, another one for my reading list

[-] Maeve1@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 1 month ago

I think there's a misunderstanding in the use of the word. Petite, petty mean the same thing, "small, not having great significance." So "petty officer," is of small significance to an officer, "petty cash" is for small cost purchases, where an order of significance needs to be placed with approved suppliers through appropriate established vendors, "petty grudge/behavior" (aka microaggressions) while exhausting, take emotional energy better spent elsewhere, like focusing on self care and the task at hand, rather than feeding the beast that will simply and calmly DARVO us, causing lost income for survival, friends via abuse by proxy, etc.

The problem is Western institutions dumbing us down and emotionally ramping us up so that the hunger games odds are even more ever not in our favor.

[-] DonLongSchlong@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 1 month ago

Huh, i learned something new. I thought petty really was only ever used as in "petty squabbling" and that it had no other meaning outside of that. It makes sense with your explanation.

Thank you!

this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2025
51 points (96.4% liked)

Communism

10088 readers
4 users here now

Discussion Community for fellow Marxist-Leninists and other Marxists.

Rules for /c/communism

Rules that visitors must follow to participate. May be used as reasons to report or ban.

  1. No non-marxists

This subreddit is here to facilitate discussion between marxists.

There are other communities aimed at helping along new communists. This community isn't here to convert naysayers to marxism.

If you are a member of the police, armed forces, or any other part of the repressive state apparatus of capitalist nations, you will be banned.

  1. No oppressive language

Do not attempt to justify your use of oppressive language.

Doing this will almost assuredly result in a ban. Accept the criticism in a principled manner, edit your post or comment accordingly, and move on, learning from your mistake.

We believe that speech, like everything else, has a class character, and that some speech can be oppressive. This is why speech that is patriarchal, white supremacist, cissupremacist, homophobic, ableist, or otherwise oppressive is banned.

TERF is not a slur.

  1. No low quality or off-topic posts

Posts that are low-effort or otherwise irrelevant will be removed.

This is not a place to engage in meta-drama or discuss random reactionaries on lemmy or anywhere else.

This includes memes and circlejerking.

This includes most images, such as random books or memorabilia you found.

We ask that amerikan posters refrain from posting about US bourgeois politics. The rest of the world really doesn’t care that much.

  1. No basic questions about marxism

Posts asking entry-level questions will be removed.

Questions like “What is Maoism?” or “Why do Stalinists believe what they do?” will be removed, as they are not the focus on this forum.

  1. No sectarianism

Marxists of all tendencies are welcome here.

Refrain from sectarianism, defined here as unprincipled criticism. Posts trash-talking a certain tendency or marxist figure will be removed. Circlejerking, throwing insults around, and other pettiness is unacceptable.

If criticisms must be made, make them in a principled manner, applying Marxist analysis.

The goal of this subreddit is the accretion of theory and knowledge and the promotion of quality discussion and criticism.

Check out ProleWiki for a communist wikipedia.

Communism study guide

bottombanner

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS