688
submitted 2 days ago by King@blackneon.net to c/opensource@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] HelloRoot@lemy.lol 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

a git history is easily fabricated. you can freely edit it, remove entries or write into it whatever you want, including impersonating other users and fabricating datetime

https://github.com/Amog-OS/AmogOS/commit/4f503a0

[-] Muehe@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 days ago

While true, a git history is also easily protected against fabrication. Require cryptographically signed commits and prevent contributors from force-pushing to the public repo and you should be good.

[-] HelloRoot@lemy.lol 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I mean, if you try to "scam" the gov, you can clone some codeberg repo to github, rename it, rewrite history to make the commits look like you did everything and then tell the gov "look at how much work I volunteered". At least in germany, there are currently not enough public workers so many little things go unchecked.

[-] Muehe@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Ah I see, yeah I guess something like that would be possible. On the other hand it would be trivial to prove this happened even in the future as long as the government keeps a unedited copy of this repo.

this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2025
688 points (99.3% liked)

Open Source

42302 readers
97 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS