40

Ripped from the other site for posterity

It’s supposed to work like this: There’s 5 rounds of debate. First round they are supposed to give a hot take. Rounds 2 and 3 they’re supposed to react to each other (shared chat history). Rounds 4 and 5 they’re supposed to vote.

This was meant to be a demo of the parallel models capability, but people seem interested in the debate idea itself… I think the actual debate performance could be improved significantly!

Source code is in this PR here if anyone wants to hack on it: https://github.com/lemonade-sdk/lemonade/pull/648

https://www.reddit.com/user/jfowers_amd/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] pennomi@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

I agree it’s a bad approach, but also fairly entertaining. I’d love to see it done in a more rigorous fashion though.

this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2025
40 points (90.0% liked)

LocalLLaMA

3945 readers
2 users here now

Welcome to LocalLLaMA! Here we discuss running and developing machine learning models at home. Lets explore cutting edge open source neural network technology together.

Get support from the community! Ask questions, share prompts, discuss benchmarks, get hyped at the latest and greatest model releases! Enjoy talking about our awesome hobby.

As ambassadors of the self-hosting machine learning community, we strive to support each other and share our enthusiasm in a positive constructive way.

Rules:

Rule 1 - No harassment or personal character attacks of community members. I.E no namecalling, no generalizing entire groups of people that make up our community, no baseless personal insults.

Rule 2 - No comparing artificial intelligence/machine learning models to cryptocurrency. I.E no comparing the usefulness of models to that of NFTs, no comparing the resource usage required to train a model is anything close to maintaining a blockchain/ mining for crypto, no implying its just a fad/bubble that will leave people with nothing of value when it burst.

Rule 3 - No comparing artificial intelligence/machine learning to simple text prediction algorithms. I.E statements such as "llms are basically just simple text predictions like what your phone keyboard autocorrect uses, and they're still using the same algorithms since <over 10 years ago>.

Rule 4 - No implying that models are devoid of purpose or potential for enriching peoples lives.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS