28
hmmm
(discuss.tchncs.de)
classic
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2025
28 points (96.7% liked)
hmmm
7160 readers
42 users here now
For things that are "hmmm".
Rule 1: All post titles except for meta posts should be just plain "hmmm" and nothing else, no emotes, no capitalisation, no extending it to "hmmmm" etc.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I believe vision-only is driven by legal issues. There will be times when vision and other sensors provide conflicting info. If a car crashes, it will be deemed at fault if the vision recording shows it made a mistake (even though other sensors induce it made the right call) - this is because any judge or jury can really only interpret the vision data. Thus there is no point is having the car make any choices other than what vision indicates.
Wow. No. Just no. We don't build tech based on a juror can appreciate. We build tech to work.
From an engineering point of view, of course we want to do that. From a business point of view it's really not the goal, sadly.
You know LIDAR data can be visualized as well, yes?
Sure, but people who can't get out of jury duty, aren't usually very smart.
the dumbest shit i heard today