762
submitted 3 days ago by VoxAliorum@lemmy.ml to c/opensource@lemmy.ml

I do not really have a body for this. I was not aware that this is a thing and still feel like this is bs, but maybe there is an actual explanation for HDMI Forum's decision that I am missing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

This wouldn’t work to scale. If Valve paid to license the spec for the Linux kernel, it would have to pay for every person who downloaded the driver, which is far more than the amount of people who buy the Steam Cube.

Unless of course you’re suggesting that the kernel driver for the new spec become closed source.

[-] legion02@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

OK. Fine. Then it's going to be reverse engineered and everyone will use it anyways and they'll get nothing.

[-] iopq@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

It's not, people will just convert DP to HDMI and call it a day

[-] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago

Unfortunately, I am — or rather, I am suggesting that Valve be granted a license they can use.

I like open source, but not so much that I'd prefer hardware that already exists be held back a feature because others can't benefit for free.

I'd prefer a workaround.

this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2025
762 points (99.6% liked)

Open Source

42579 readers
151 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS