762

HDMI Forum is unwilling to disclose the 2.1 specification for open-source (Linux): according to AMD, they had submitted a functional, HDMI 2.1-compatible driver [for linux?], which the Forum rejected. (www.heise.de)

submitted 3 days ago by VoxAliorum@lemmy.ml to c/opensource@lemmy.ml

175 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I do not really have a body for this. I was not aware that this is a thing and still feel like this is bs, but maybe there is an actual explanation for HDMI Forum's decision that I am missing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago

tbh I looked at audio jacks in internals, and they do usually have double the footprint on a pcb than what you see outside of it, at least on low end consumer devices:

That's not to say that they couldn't put anything more compact in a highend device like a smart phone.

[-] Jarix@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

Okay but I have a usbc slot, speakers, stylus, and an audio jack all on the bottom of my new phone. It's bullshit that they needed the room as evidenced by this 2025 phone.

It can also use an sdcard. Greedy fucking corporations just wanting you to repurchase stuff you already have.

[-] moopet@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

There are sane reasons to ditch an audio port. Like, physical connectors are fragile. Why use something that's so often broken, when you don't need to? Why include circuitry for something that you don't need? At this point, physical audio ports are there for backwards compatibility. I'm not saying wired headphones are bad - I have wired headphones - but phones are the least useful place for them.