761
submitted 2 days ago by VoxAliorum@lemmy.ml to c/opensource@lemmy.ml

I do not really have a body for this. I was not aware that this is a thing and still feel like this is bs, but maybe there is an actual explanation for HDMI Forum's decision that I am missing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] PieMePlenty@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

Be a shame if it leaked on the internet.

[-] addie@feddit.uk 7 points 2 days ago

I'm going to guess it would require kernel support, but certainly graphics card driver support. AMD and Intel not so difficult, just patch and recompile; NVIDIA's binary blob ha ha fat chance. Stick it in a repo somewhere outside of the zone of copyright control, add it to your package manager, boom, done.

I bet it's not even much code. A struct or two that map the contents of the 2.1 handshake, and an extension to a switch statement that says what to do if it comes down the wire.

[-] ozymandias117@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

nvidia has HDMI 2.1 last I checked.

They can do it because their driver (even nvidia "open") is a proprietary blob

[-] PieMePlenty@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

nouveau? Switch between drivers if you wanna use HDMI 2.1 or proprietary nvidia when you wanna game! It won't make any sense, but it will piss off the right people :D

[-] chillpanzee@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago

It probably already has been, and Steam likely already has the specification. They just can't open source an HDMI 2.1 implementation without consequences.

this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2025
761 points (99.6% liked)

Open Source

42567 readers
1019 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS