125
Ford Will Take $19.5 Billion Hit as It Rolls Back E.V. Plans
(www.nytimes.com)
Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.
As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.
I've still yet to find anyone who is able to post any data except a 2018 axios hit piece about trucks not being used properly or being happy with the use case.
So for the thousandths time on Reddit/Lemmy, what data are you using to form that opinion?
How about you provide evidence for how something which burns through far more finite resources than necessary is somehow better for society?
On top of having far worse visibility, taking up too much space on roads and parking lots, and being responsible for more pedestrian deaths than smaller, more reasonably proportioned vehicles?
Look at you, going off on a tangent.
So to be clear, you do not have the data to back up the opinion, right?
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022437522000810
https://www.npr.org/2023/11/14/1212737005/cars-trucks-pedestrian-deaths-increase-crash-data