53
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2025
53 points (98.2% liked)
Tech
2355 readers
164 users here now
A community for high quality news and discussion around technological advancements and changes
Things that fit:
- New tech releases
- Major tech changes
- Major milestones for tech
- Major tech news such as data breaches, discontinuation
Things that don't fit
- Minor app updates
- Government legislation
- Company news
- Opinion pieces
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Time to move to Codeberg or Forgejo, or self-host a bare git repo.
Or Gitlab. Unless Gitlab is terrible for some reason.
I like your comment because I always feel like I'm so late with news that someone will always point out why my suggestion is bad or even worse than the original.
But: atleast with gitlab you can partially* self host it if they are/get bad.
*afaik gitlab's SaaS (gitlab.com) isn't entirely open-source. Not sure which bits can not be self hosted.
You can run it self hosted and self host runners, some features are paywalled but you can work around them.
There are two editions of Gitlab - community edition (completely open source) and enterprise edition (closed source additions). You can run CE completely free. You can actually run EE completely free too, there are just some features disabled
That’s what I am saying, you can run it free just without some of the enterprise features.
But they are all able to be worked around, you’ll just wish you had paid by the time you work around them.
Yep, just clariftying what that means in terms of open source too, which i know folks here care about
OH, I didn’t recognize the differentiation in your comment.
Makes sense.
Gtlab will never implement federation on their own. ForgeJo is working on it as we speak.
Okay. The article isn’t about how GitHub isn’t federating.
Sure, but you were talking about gitlab being terrible. I made a comment about one of its shortcomings (which isn't terrible, but not great either). If you wanted something terrible about gitlab's devops, you should said so.