92
Impeachment articles filed against RFK Jr., claiming abuse of power
(arstechnica.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2025
92 points (98.9% liked)
politics
27079 readers
488 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Way to be there, guys...
More evidence on the controlled opposition pile that will be completely ignored by the Dem guzzlers here.
Yeah, we should elect more republicans, amirite?
No they're saying don't vote. That always works out so good.
No, they're saying we need to be WAY more proactive before the primaries to replace the traditional corpo-dems with people that will be substantially more progressive, and substantially further left on the overton window. Those candidates need to win their primaries and fix the party that's currently broken by the corpo-dems.
Wow, I’ve managed to say a lot of things without using any words, apparently.
Yah and you painted the entire post with a broad brush already, you can't pretend to be offended.
I don’t even understand what you’re trying to say. How would you categorize my representation of “the entire post”? Please use quotes if possible.
This is just a weird, cynical take that makes you sound like the tankies who regularly escape .ml, where anyone who isn't marching in an olive drab jumpsuit with a red star is a "dem loving liberal."
It’s cynical, sure.
If you’re not a cynic towards politicians, you’re kind of a dumbass.
Why do you think that the establishment Dems aren’t backing this impeachment?
It was cynicism towards people in the post even before reading people's comments, it's deliberately inflammatory and I call that stupid attention-seeking shit out when I see it.
Ok but that’s not what I said, so why make shit up? It hurts your feelings that much when people mention the DNC’s own actions?
Oh lord you're one of them. Never mind, another for the list.
Watch out! The Tankie Terminator is on the scene!
No the rest of the world is saying "VOTE IN A THIRD OPTION AS THE TWO YOU HAVE ARE ASS!"
And we keep telling you that isn't how our system is set up but you aren't interested in understanding.
Canada has a similar system (whichever candidate recieves a plurality of the votes wins the seat in the region) and has 5 different parties in their government.
Westminster-style parliament is far less "winner takes all" than the US system though. We don't even really have an executive branch in the sense that the US does, and we have many more levers that can be pulled to topple an abusive government - including by royal decree.
In the US, if an official needs to be removed, they have to be impeached and convicted by their peers, after which they are removed and depending on what their position/home state/etc, they may leave a vacant seat or have a replacement appointed until the next elected. However in the case of the president, there is a clear line of succession, and it it virtually guaranteed that everyone in that line is ideologically aligned.
In Canada, there is a recall process that is initiated by the voters as a petition, put to a vote by the people, and if successful, that person is immediately removed and a by-election is called.
In the US, if the government can't pass a budget, it shits itself and shuts down. In Canada, if the government can't pass a budget, parliament is dissolved and there's a new election - but everything else just keeps running based on the last successful budget.
Sounds like the US has a shitty system and they should improve it. None of that is relevant to actually developing a third party however. There is 1 single president but (theoretically) needs support of the House and Senate. Recalls and budgets are irrelevant to the issue of only having 2 parties.
No, I was not encouraging people in the US to vote 3rd party in the last election. But now is an excellent time to start working on some 3rd party candidates for 2028.
Officially we're down to three, and the trend over the last decade is not promising:
And we keep telling you that it is your system that you all are responsable for and we don't care that you use it as an excuse while dragging the rest of the world down with you.
My state has about as much political influence over Florida as Portugal has over Hungary. Being in the same union doesn't mean that what they do has anything to do with me even if ours is dressed up as a single country.
Exactly, as you said you don't understand and you aren't interested in understanding. Thanks for making that clear.
I have never said in any way shape or form that I don't understand the terrible us system. I think you must be confusing me with someone else.
Look, you did imply it. Whether you meant to or not. By answering "And we keep telling you that it is your system that you all are responsable for and we don't care that you use it as an excuse while dragging the rest of the world down with you." to "And we keep telling you that isn't how our system is set up but you aren't interested in understanding." you are implying that the statement you are responding to is correct. It's a 'yes, and' statement, like in improv comedy.
What are you doing to help?
Americans love their "France surrenders" memes, but when it comes to issues within their own country the response is always "there's nothing we can do, why aren't you fixing it for us?"
Not being an american, and active in my own community to make sure we never become even like you.
LOL.
/facepalm
These comments read like Russian propaganda that only helps trump
Let’s turn this on its head then: what would be an acceptable way for me to provide any criticism whatsoever of a political party that doesn’t represent me well without being instantly called a *shuffles cards* Russian bot?
How about, "The system is broken in multiple ways, a list of which can be provided, and the behavior of most Democrats is merely a symptom or self-serving response to the state of that system"?
Yes all those DNC leaders are just innocent cogs in the system taking all their bribes that they just have to take.
So, are you saying that taking bribes isn't in their self-interest, or that there are no repercussions from taking bribes which would be a flaw in the system? There are the first two items you can put on that list I was talking about.
So your logic is that politicians should always do something as long as it’s not illegal? That sounds quite MAGA of you…
As if Russian bots were not just outted as major maga supporters. Do you live under a rock?! Maga is a psyop for m Russia to ruin America, and y'allkayda fell for it hook line and sinker
I didn’t fall for jack shit. You can criticize the bullshit useless DNC without wearing a red cap, you know.
Contact them. Flood their inboxes, chats, and phone lines.