31
The cardinal sin of software architecture
(functional.computer)
Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!
Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.
Hope you enjoy the instance!
Rules
Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev
ELI5?
Author wrote a lot of words about data and state, but I'm not sure I understand the argument. Please explain like I'm 5?
When designing large, complex systems, you try to break things down into manageable chunks. For example, the bit that deals with user login or authentication. The payment bit. Something that needs to happen periodically. That sort of thing.
Before you know it, there are tens, or hundreds of chunks, each talking to each other or getting triggered when something happens. Problem is, how do these bits share data with each other. You can copy all the data between each chunk, but that's not very time efficient. And if something goes wrong, you end up with a mess of inconsistent data everywhere.
So what bits of data do you keep in a shared place? What gets copied around from place to place? And what gets only used for that one function to get the job done? This is the job of software architects to sort out.
The author says the more copies of something you make, the more complexity and 'state' management you have to deal with. He's right, but there are ways to mitigate the problem.
I think they just had some bad experiences with bad software and generalized it. If you just glue together separate components with separate data and configuration then you’re going to have a bad day.
TLDR: data is something you collect over time from users, so you shouldn't let the contracts for it mindlessly drift, or you might render old data unusable. Keeping those contracts in one place helps keep them organized.
But that explanation sucks if you're actually five, so I asked ChatGPT to do that explanation for you since that would be hard for me to do: