52
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2025
52 points (98.1% liked)
Technology
81283 readers
1301 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
There are upsides.
Software freedom is usually associated with FOSS (legal and public exchange), but there's also scene (underground exchange based on personal connections).
The latter, of course, is not quite the heaven many people have learned to believe in, with everything being a public verified project with all the source code visible and legal to use for every purpose.
But the latter also has advantages, it's a non-neutered culture with all the old anarchist and hacker substrate.
Any heaven offered is usually a trap anyway.
I wonder if the whole purpose of promotion of FOSS by big companies was, long-term, this. Finding some way to abuse openness and collect for free the resource that becomes digital oil in the next stage, but only for those who own the foundries - computing resources for ML, that is.
I don't see the point of romanticizing the scene as preserving some "pure" hacker ethos and conflating it with FOSS.
I'd rather use some free and open source software I can audit and trust rather than some pirated shit some company built.
FOSS creates sustainable value. Companies can build businesses around FOSS through services, support, hosting, and custom development. The scene creates nothing, they don't promote standards, don't think of interoperability and so on.
The internet and the very service you're using run on open source software. The people that build them have values and I don't think at any point they thought of creating something for LLMs to train on - that's like the dumbest conspiracy theory I've read since a long time and it doesn't even make sense timeline-wise.
The original FOSS licenses were designed to restrict corporate exploitation, not enable it (even if you have some more permissive licenses that make more sense to be used in a enterprise context), but it was promoted because it worked better and created value.
Would you say the same thing to an artist that freely shared his art and see his work copied in the output of some generative ai tool? That would be victim-blaming
No, but a bit more culturally mature in the sense of diversity of philosophy.
So, if you just change the mood in these few sentences, you'll get what I'm trying to say.
You don't think? I might have encountered some people you'd expect to be good. They are really not that. Let's not conflate having values with having made contributions.
Designed to do that at the expense of being constrained by law and public morality.
Life is complex.