374
Memory is running out, and so are excuses for software bloat
(www.theregister.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2025
374 points (98.2% liked)
Programming
27148 readers
442 users here now
Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!
Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.
Hope you enjoy the instance!
Rules
Rules
- Follow the programming.dev instance rules
- Keep content related to programming in some way
- If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos
Wormhole
Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
.clone() everything!
I do kind of agree in a way though. Rust forces you to think a bit about memory and the language does tend to guide towards good design. But it's not magic and it's easy to write inefficient Rust too. Especially if you just clone everything. But I personally find Rust to be a good mix of low level control that feels sufficiently high level.
Garbage collected languages can be memory efficient too though. Having easily shared references is great!
After you’ve cloned everything you’ll
Arc<Mutex<>>everything.