104
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2025
104 points (99.1% liked)
Programming
24146 readers
349 users here now
Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!
Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.
Hope you enjoy the instance!
Rules
Rules
- Follow the programming.dev instance rules
- Keep content related to programming in some way
- If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos
Wormhole
Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I'm a slow adopter of new technologies like ~~AI~~ LLMs. My reasoning is that if it turns out to actually be a good product, then it will eventually prove itself, and the early adopters can be the "beta testers" so to speak. But if it turns out to be a bad product, then I won't have wasted my time on something that isn't worthwhile.
Maybe a day comes when I start using these tools, but they clearly just aren't all that useful in their current form. In all honesty, I'm pretty sure that they will never be useful enough for me to consider them worth learning, but definitely not so today.
They talk like there's training needed, that it's some learned skill. It's just a means to blame the worker instead of the AI for not boosting productivity.
I'm interested to see in 5 years or so, once all the hyper-hype is hopefully subsides, what actual uses remain and how they look.
Yeah if anything all the people screeching that you have to adopt now or you'll be replaced by those that do just destroy their credibility.