67
submitted 6 days ago by ByteMe@lemmy.world to c/opensource@lemmy.ml

Is it good? Are there any better alternatives?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] philosoph@lemmy.ml 8 points 6 days ago

AFAIK 3rd party clients not supported cause of lack e2e encryption support

[-] ttyybb@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

I still think it would be better to give the user freedom, and just give a warning that there are privacy risks.

[-] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

There is a small important distinction.

It is because there is no proprietary e2e encryption by default exclusively while communicating with others on tuta.

E2e encryption for 99.99999% of emails is via passworded pgp that everyone else has and uses or not encrypted at all. I have tuta for years and have yet to send or recieve a single encrypted mail that is the reason that they can't have a 3rd party app outside of tuta's own advertisements I get served.

It is vendor lock in. Pure, plain, and simple.

this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2026
67 points (95.9% liked)

Open Source

43639 readers
525 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS