33

ICE’s approval rating among Americans currently sits at negative 13 points, a recent poll revealed.

More Americans support abolishing the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency than at any point since it was established in 2003, new polling shows.

According to data examined by Civiqs, 42% support getting rid of the agency while 50% oppose doing so, a split of just 8 points. This represents a major shift from a year ago, at the start of Donald Trump’s second term, when only 24% of Americans supported abolishing ICE and 59% opposed the idea, a 35-point split.

The 27-point change over the past year comes as Trump uses the agency to terrorize immigrant communities and overrun U.S. cities in the name of his mass deportation campaign, often using tactics that are not only harmful but illegal.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Democrats are the only way to improve the situation we are in.

(Audience beware the lemmy.ml / hexbear poster who submits garbage like, "Republicans are honest fascists. Democrats are fascists in disguise." lol.)

[-] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Then why have the material conditions for the working class gotten worse over the last 25 years when your Democrats have been in power for 13 of them? Democrats are covert fascists

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

You don't understand how Congress works, do you?

[-] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago

It's working exactly as designed. I know your next stage is to blame Republicans for obstruction, but why is it Republicans get everything they want regardless if they hold the majority and if they hold the minority? Yet Democrats are ineffective in both scenarios.

[-] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 weeks ago

Ehh the Democrats ounce In power will undoubtedly increase ice funding just make it less blatant so no they aren't a solution.

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Ehhh this is total bullshit speculation not even grounded in historical reality.

Give me the Biden days over these Trump days any day and spare me the false equivalence trope that is convenient for Republicans.

[-] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Ah the good ol' "nothing would fundamentally change" days.

That should be the slogan of the Dems.

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Ah but I mean one thing would fundamentally change.

Renee Good would still be alive and three children would still have their mother.

[-] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago

ICE saw their largest increase of federal funding under Biden. Democrats provide a gun to Republicans than try to act surprised when they use it

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

Would've happened regardless; the problem was a majority of Americans were convinced immigration was a problem. This was an attempt of appeasement of the masses ahead of the election.

I stand by what I said.

[-] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago

If my grandmother had wheels she'd be a wagon

[-] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Except it's exactly what Biden did in 2020 and what Harris promised to do if she won so very grounded.

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Except it's really not.

Anyone who thinks Renee Good would've been shot and killed under Biden or Harris administration are patently delusional and enabling Trumpian dogma.

Anyone want to play a game of identifying how many ICE murders there were between all of Obama and Biden administrations versus Trump?

Edit: Back, tankies! Back I say!

Your friendly reminder that these two images are banned in their respective leaders' nations, and that by viewing them from your location puts you at risk for prison time in your country, should you reside there!

[-] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 weeks ago

The only place those images are banned are in the minds of liberals that believe the propaganda that they are banned in their respective countries

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

That's incorrect. They are absolutely banned in their respective countries. Do you need sources on this?

[-] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 weeks ago

You gonna provide Western sources for your claim, the same ones claiming they are illegal?

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Your English is poor. You aren't winning social points for this unconvincing apologist rhetoric. Or is this punishment already for an infraction? Perhaps mentioning Uyghurs, Tibetans, Hong Kong, or Taiwan sovereignty?

I wonder if one expects unbiased sources from within a totalitarian regime like North Korea or China going, "Yep! We totally oppress!" haha. So what sources DO you trust? I'm curious!

[-] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 weeks ago

You are struggling so hard to be relevant you resorted to ad hominem argumentum

this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2026
33 points (100.0% liked)

politics

27941 readers
861 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS