124
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] misk@piefed.social 9 points 1 week ago

What standards would Microsoft EEE in this case? POSIX?

[-] brian@programming.dev 13 points 1 week ago

they might ship a proprietary lib with their os, encourage developers to use it, then license it out of being distributed

[-] misk@piefed.social 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I imagine it’d be more like Android/iOS. Lock down bootloader so you can’t tamper with the OS, enforce notarisation requirement so that apps have to go through them. But Microsoft can’t do that, they don’t have any users vendor-locked to their application store. Valve on the other hand is in a much better position to do this.

[-] 0x0@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago
[-] misk@piefed.social 5 points 1 week ago

That’s not what EEE is.

[-] 0x0@lemmy.zip -1 points 1 week ago

By all means do nitpick the specific meaning of EEE, might be amusing to others.

[-] misk@piefed.social 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I just don’t like people throwing around terms they don’t understand, leads to weird outcomes like people saying Meta would EEE ActivityPub back when every instance decided to defederate Threads.

this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2026
124 points (92.5% liked)

Linux

11486 readers
421 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS