9
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by Hopa@sh.itjust.works to c/mildlyinteresting@lemmy.world

The journal Nature Medicine published a major study about a cohort of over 105,000 people followed for 30 years. This is that researchers found.

Source

Correlation isn't causation. But that's still interesting.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub 1 points 1 week ago

Conversely, it’s surprising to see fruit so high up, while fish and poultry are in the middle. Does this mean only vegetarian people eat healthy? Hardly believable for an omnivorous animal like humans.

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Being an omnivore allows us to get calories from multiple sources, which allows us to live long enough to breed. That's an evolutionary advantage.

After the point of breeding and raising children, evolution taps out.

So something being an evolutionary trait does not mean those traits lead to longevity. But it guarantees we're good fuckers.

[-] JeSuisUnHombre@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 week ago

There's debate on if humans are actually omnivores.

[-] TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Very big caveat: while our primate cousins manage to eat some meat from time to time, it was our domestication of fire more than a million year ago that allowed us to access plenty of calories and nutrients from almost any food, everything was suddenly on the table, and was made easy to chew and digest. We are more omnivorous than the naturally omnivorous animals.

this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2026
9 points (100.0% liked)

Mildly Interesting

24466 readers
50 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS