9
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by Hopa@sh.itjust.works to c/mildlyinteresting@lemmy.world

The journal Nature Medicine published a major study about a cohort of over 105,000 people followed for 30 years. This is that researchers found.

Source

Correlation isn't causation. But that's still interesting.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yea, we'd need to filter out the behavioural angles to clearly identify causal relationships.

Do people who live longer just happen to start eating differently etc.

For example, the better I feel, the better I eat. It's not the bad eating that makes me feel bad - the better eating is a consequence of feeling better.

I can tell exactly when my diet is going to tank, when my chronic conditions flare. Diet has zero effect on them.

this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2026
9 points (100.0% liked)

Mildly Interesting

24493 readers
2 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS