143
Wayland didn’t kill Linux desktops, but it did expose their weakest assumptions [EDIT: Warning, article likely written with AI assistance] (www.xda-developers.com)
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net to c/linux@programming.dev
79 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] slowcakes@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago

I still use x11 with suckless dwm, but for work I'm forced to use Ubuntu 25.10 gnome shit. It's a sad state. Gnome owns all the process you start via gnome, that is why if gnome dies all the child process es dies as well, genius. Because the buggy mess, doesn't critical errors and never will have...

I don't know how you use gnome, if it doesn't crash for you, fine, good. But that's not my reality, it can crash because I open the laptop screen while being on an external monitor. It can crash because I'm screen sharing, it can crash because some software I used froze, it can crash for random reason (doesn't happen often, but still annoying).

[-] arcterus@piefed.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 month ago

I still use x11 with suckless dwm

I can tell from the way you write, no need to mention it.

[-] slowcakes@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago

No worries, I would like you to have it in written statement.

this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2026
143 points (85.6% liked)

Linux

12778 readers
586 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Ategon@programming.dev
anzo@programming.dev
dwraf_of_ignorance@programming.dev