371
We Want Collapse (mander.xyz)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] commiunism@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 2 weeks ago

Yup, once the only bad country in existence (US) is out of the picture, every other country that currently exist, who definitely don't brutalize proles and certainly don't have any interest in imperialism will turn communist and end centuries of suffering for all....

Collapses too are notoriously peaceful and civil and certainly don't result in millions of deaths until another bourgeois hitler takes power

[-] PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Yup, once the only bad country in existence (US) is out of the picture, every other country that currently exist, who definitely don't brutalize proles and certainly don't have any interest in imperialism will turn communist and end centuries of suffering for all....

I think you're yelling at someone else? Maybe OP? I'm not pro-{any country}, but I am an anarchist and AmeriKKKa is absolutely my biggest op right now.

Collapses too are notoriously peaceful and civil and certainly don't result in millions of deaths until another bourgeois hitler takes power

The status quo is more dangerous than collapse, full stop. Whatever millions of deaths the collapse of AmeriKKKa will cause in the short term, capitalism as it currently exists will cause orders of magnitude more in the longer term (eventually all of us!) and more than collapse even in the short term, but just in ways that are designed to be hard to notice.

[-] commiunism@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 weeks ago

No, collapse of US wouldn't even really hurt capitalism - all it's gonna do is change what nation state is currently the center of capital (likely Germany, Japan or China) who would pick up the slack and status quo is maintained.

In fact, a collapse of such a large hegemony would probably bolster global capital given how it'd take out a ton of accumulated capital, solving overproduction (main capitalist contradiction) for the short-term and making countries temporarily prosper in a fashion not too dissimilar to post-WW2 era. This would legitimize rule of capital further since the times are good.

[-] PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I'm with you on the first paragraph, hence why downfall of the US is necessary but insufficient for communism.

In fact, a collapse of such a large hegemony would probably bolster global capital given how it'd take out a ton of accumulated capital

Yeah if AmeriKKKa got nuked into the stone age or otherwise completely obliterated all at once, but if it fell to consistent communists or socialists, the accumulated capital would be expropriated and given back to the people, right?

solving overproduction (main capitalist contradiction)

I don't think that AmeriKKKa is the only country causing overproduction.

This would legitimize rule of capital further since the times are good.

Which is why our comrades outside of AmeriKKKa need to prepare for our downfall and learn the lessons of our genocidal history, namely to never settle for what the capitalists offer you.


But we can honestly agree to disagree on the details of the future. My main goal is to demonstrate that there is an anti-AmeriKKKa position that isn't just "Middle class 14 year old leftists and self-hating third worldists try not to jerk off at the thought of proles in the west dying". Like AmeriKKKa is the flag of the people who want to put me and my family and all my friends and all my comrades in camps. Of course I'm rooting for its downfall!

[-] commiunism@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

We can't really agree to disagree on wishful thinking vs centuries of materialist analysis that has been historically proven time and time again, sorry.

Yeah if got nuked into the stone age or otherwise completely obliterated all at once, but if it fell to consistent communists or socialists, the accumulated capital would be expropriated and given back to the people, right?

Accumulated value being destroyed doesn't just mean physically existing property (e.g. factories and houses) but also fictitious capital such as bonds and stocks which would result in instant wipe out of capital on paper, collapse of existing factory supply chains meaning they can no longer produce nor sell profitably which devalues them significantly and I can go on and on. This would allow capital abroad to fill in these market spaces with their own produce and enjoy increased profits since competition just got taken out.

Also, it's not up to some "communists and socialists" to pick up the slack - for a revolution to happen, the proletariat as a class has to rise up and fight for their own emancipation. The job of communists is to shift the consciousness from trade union (e.g. merely making conditions better) to communist consciousness (e.g. abolishment of the current state of things) and making sure the revolution succeeds via leadership. Without that, literally nothing can be achieved apart from mere spectacle, as shown by urban guerillas, years of lead and so on, and any collapse would just result in different reactionaries taking power as history shows.

If there's actual class consciousness in a country, collapse isn't necessary at all. If there isn't, collapse wouldn't bring anything other than suffering and shift back towards status quo.

[-] PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

We can't really agree to disagree on wishful thinking vs centuries of materialist analysis that has been historically proven time and time again, sorry.

No we actually can agree to disagree, because maybe I have reached my conclusions through a materialist but distinct analysis. Reasonable minds can differ on most things. Give it a shot!

bonds and stocks which would result in instant wipe out of capital on paper

Good. It wasn't real anyways, so we shouldn't be playing along like it is.

collapse of existing factory supply chains

Does collapse of AmeriKKKa necessarily mean collapse of the supply chains? I'm skeptical that workers will stop working in absence of the AmeriKKKa boot; if anything, workers will be more productive.

As long as "leadership" doesn't mean a vanguard, then I really don't have any problems with the second paragraph, and frankly it is a more precise version of what I want to see.

If there's actual class consciousness in a country, collapse isn't necessary at all.

The problem is that the military and cops are not proletarians and never will align with our interests. So even if the proletariat fully achieved class consciousness, we would have to fight the military and the cops at a bare minimum. I.e., the AmeriKKKa government and their forces would need to collapse.

If there isn't, collapse wouldn't bring anything other than suffering and shift back towards status quo.

It would take AmeriKKKa and its evils off the world stage, saving millions of lives, albeit not mine. Obviously I want collapse with class consciousness, but I'm not gonna pretend like it wouldn't be beneficial for everyone else if AmeriKKKa disappeared overnight, because it would be.

[-] commiunism@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Does collapse of US necessarily mean collapse of the supply chains?

Obviously. State collapsing = nobody is ensuring safety of trade routes anymore, nobody organizing ports, clearing international payments, controlling foreign relations to facilitate trade - in other words, the collapsed state becomes isolated. Firms that had international contracts to provide raw materials for their factories would also flee or fail, making production largely impossible.

What this leaves you with is people's needs not being met and famine, factories that can't produce anything, violence out of desperation and foreign peacekeeping affairs trying to keep things stable while also furthering any interests they might have (like installing a new government). This is where the mass prole death comes from.

The problem is that the military and cops are not proletarians and never will align with our interests. So even if the proletariat fully achieved class consciousness, we would have to fight the military and the cops at a bare minimum.

This is straight up just bs. Military and cops are proletarian, but are also class traitors since they protect and uphold capitalist rule. This goes against their material interests however (nobody is interested in dying for their national bourgeois at the trenches) and is a product of bourgeois society instilling nationalism and war propaganda into its populace.

Also if you were to look at previous revolutions, military was instrumental as most would refuse to shoot at masses of workers trying to overthrow the bourgeois rule and emancipate themselves, joining their side and overwhelming the government. Without the military joining the side of proletariat, the revolutionaries are no match against trained military tactics and equipment. With a collapsed state, the threat becomes foreign military intervention which would result in the exact same premise.

Anyway this is my last wall of text that nobody reads, I cba to explain basic history or economics anymore.

this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2026
371 points (90.9% liked)

Lefty Memes

6692 readers
739 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of "ML" (read: Dengist) influence. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, discussion and agitprop/stuff that's better fit for a poster than a meme go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, updooting good contributions and downdooting those of low quality!

Rules

Version without spoilers

0. Only post socialist memes


That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme. Please post agitprop here)


0.5 [Provisional Rule] Use alt text or image descriptions to allow greater accessibility


(Please take a look at our wiki page for the guidelines on how to actually write alternative text!)

We require alternative text (from now referred to as "alt text") to be added to all posts/comments containing media, such as images, animated GIFs, videos, audio files, and custom emojis.
EDIT: For files you share in the comments, a simple summary should be enough if they’re too complex.

We are committed to social equity and to reducing barriers of entry, including (digital) communication and culture. It takes each of us only a few moments to make a whole world of content (more) accessible to a bunch of folks.

When alt text is absent, a reminder will be issued. If you don't add the missing alt text within 48 hours, the post will be removed. No hard feelings.


0.5.1 Style tip about abbreviations and short forms


When writing stuff like "lol" and "iirc", it's a good idea to try and replace those with their all caps counterpart

  • ofc => OFC
  • af = AF
  • ok => OK
  • lol => LOL
  • bc => BC
  • bs => BS
  • iirc => IIRC
  • cia => CIA
  • nato => Nato (you don't spell it when talking, right?)
  • usa => USA
  • prc => PRC
  • etc.

Why? Because otherwise (AFAIK), screen readers will try to read them out as actually words instead of spelling them


1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here


Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.


2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such


That means condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.


3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.


That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" (read: Dengists) (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).


4. No Bigotry.


The only dangerous minority is the rich.


5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)


6. Don't irrationally idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.



  1. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS