0
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2026
0 points (50.0% liked)
Environment
5203 readers
1 users here now
Environmental and ecological discussion, particularly of things like weather and other natural phenomena (especially if they're not breaking news).
See also our Nature and Gardening community for discussion centered around things like hiking, animals in their natural habitat, and gardening (urban or rural).
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
Thanks for interesting reply, but I do not know if I understand your point.
Sure there is the problem with manufacturing oil period, & I agree with you we must stop that to, but this was a thread about stopping plastic manufacturing. So, let us say we just go to the root, as you say, & ban oil extracting completely, then plastics are made from another material that makes the plastic take way too long to biodegrade. Where as if plastics, made from any materials that make take too long to biodegrade, are banned, then solved plastics that take too long to biodegrade. At the same time, we could ban the oil extraction & use in any products. Makes even already extracted oil worthless, & better put where it was extracted from.
If the economics taken out of producing plastics, I do not see anyone producing more plastics.
AWESOME, THANKS, I will have to check it later, just got home from 2nd-day of 3-days Homestead Rodeo protesting.
The only question have about (other not really alternatives, not completing) the additional ways to using nature to eat plastics is-
Would not bacteria eating the plastics be faster & more complete than the additional ways? Does not bacteria travel faster & is in more different environments, like oceans-water, land, sky & Etc.?