219
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/opensource@programming.dev
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] maxy@piefed.social 2 points 3 days ago

Having used both Jitsi and LiveKit, I get it. Jitsi is great if you use it as it is, but if you want to integrate video conferencing into your own solution and customize everything, LiveKit is the logical choice. (I think it is also much newer then Jitsi, which used to be the only choice.)

If they wanted to integrate a finished product, I would expect them to use Matrix over Jitsi, because it seems to have seen some use in France already.

Also, I think Matrix integrated LiveKit for video over their existing Jitsi integration, so... the ecosystem seems to flock around LiveKit anyway. So maybe the'll contribute to LiveKit if they find issues with it, and everyone benefits from that.

this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2026
219 points (99.5% liked)

Opensource

5151 readers
140 users here now

A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!

CreditsIcon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS