23

“Hey, man, is that GNU/Linux on your computer?”, “Yes.”, “Great, but I use Microsoft Windows.” You get the idea. A “heavy” academic exchange like that would sound comical, to say the least. And that’s exactly the point of this article. One of the long-running debates in the Linux ecosystem: whether the system should be called GNU/Linux or simply Linux.

First, let’s start with the dry technical facts, which you’ve probably heard a hundred times already, but they’re still worth mentioning here. Strictly speaking, Linux refers only to a single component of the operating system, namely the kernel written by Linus Torvalds. That’s it. It’s no coincidence that, if you’ve noticed, most distributions name their kernel packages accordingly, following conventions like linux-6.18.2.x64.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 3 days ago

There is no operating system with either name. The operating systems are called Debian, Arch, Fedora, Ubuntu, etc.

We need a name to collectively refer to them. If we say "Linux" because they share the Linux kernel, ok, but so does eg. Android.

What better name is there to refer to the ones in the above list, but not Android, than "GNU/Linux"?

[-] Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 days ago

How about linux.

I like to keep things simple

[-] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago
[-] bitcrafter@programming.dev 3 points 3 days ago

That might have been an apt name at first, but the UX has come along way since the early days.

[-] Limerance@piefed.social 6 points 3 days ago

The better name would be Linux/systemd/Wayland/KDE.

[-] Die4Ever@retrolemmy.com 2 points 2 days ago

I need Flatpak and AppImage support too

[-] khleedril@cyberplace.social 2 points 3 days ago

@Limerance @schnurrito Well, Linux\systemd\Wayland\KDE if that's your salt; Linux\Guix\AwesomeWM for me!

[-] bitcrafter@programming.dev 7 points 3 days ago

So what would you name the category that includes Alpine Linux and Chimera Linux, as was brought up in the article?

[-] MrSoup@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 days ago

If I recall correctly, Ubuntu switched to rust core utils, so it's no more GNU/Linux but just... Linux.

[-] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago

still uses glibc right? I think the big thing about alpine is that it uses musl as its libc

[-] lordnikon@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

POSIX would make more sense as its the collection of standards as that would encompass BSDs as well. Since you can run Linux compatible software with neither GNU utils nor Linux.

[-] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 points 3 days ago

WindowsNT was POSIX compatible, afaik

this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2026
23 points (92.6% liked)

Linux

12158 readers
399 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS