20
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Lembot_0006@programming.dev 9 points 7 hours ago

Can't government just start a huge house-building project? Aren't huge project is the very reason of the existing of the government? What's the problem? Build a few million houses/flats, sell them for their real price, and the problem will go away.

[-] Psaldorn@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Lots of MPs are landlords, more housing means lower prices on their assets and income.

[-] MonsterMonster@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago

Yes in theory but ... large private housebuilders buy up land and bank it, leaving it unbuilt to restrict supply and prevent competitors building. This drives up house prices without having to do anything.

Government likes using house prices as a measurement as to how well the economy is doing so they don't want to see house prices fall.

Building a shit load of houses to make them more affordable isn't in the interest of builders or government.

[-] FishFace@piefed.social 3 points 4 hours ago

Government can disincentivise this or just expropriate banked land.

Last I read though, land banking isn't as big of a problem as it's made out to be, and is mostly just builders having a pipeline of projects, and buying the land for projects when it's cheapest rather than the day before the spades are ready.

A land value tax should sort it out though.

[-] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 8 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

There are huge house building projects going on, at least there are in my area. However there's constraints as to how fast you can actually start these projects as you need to find suitable land, go through all the red tape and have enough resources (materials, people) to build them. So if demand keeps outpacing supply, the prices will still continue to rise.

Interestingly, I saw an article recently that average rents actually started to decrease, so maybe the increased supply is very slowly having an impact on the rental market.

Slightly off-tangent, but it frustrates me when sellers complain that they can't sell their house and then take it off the market. No, you can't sell it at the price you want, it's obviously over-priced. If you were to knock off £50k or £100k, I'd guarantee that you'd be able to sell the house.

[-] Flamekebab@piefed.social 6 points 6 hours ago

I'm reminded of a place near me that's on a flood plain. It's been on the market for ages. They seem perplexed as to why it's not been snapped up for their ridiculous asking price.

[-] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 1 points 4 hours ago

To be fair if it's on a flood plain then it should be unsellable, mortgage providers and insurers might not want to deal with it.

[-] Flamekebab@piefed.social 1 points 4 hours ago

I think with some additional flood defence it'd be fine but I'd expect the price to reflect that.

[-] tetris11@feddit.uk 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

"A couple of sandbags and you'll be fine!"

[-] Lembot_0006@programming.dev 2 points 6 hours ago

However there’s constraints as to how fast you can actually start these projects as you need to find suitable land, go through all the red tape and have enough resources (materials, people) to build them.

These constraints are negligibly small for the government, no? And this project can be active for years if needed. "Till it's over, over there."

[-] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 1 points 4 hours ago

I wouldn't say they're small constraints because they're not necessarily easy to fix. They could ease the load on the local authorities planning offices by hiring more staff or easing regulations, which will always drag on and take time. There's the fighting with NIMBY's in courts. And there's also only so many builders in the country that can be on projects at any given time.

this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2026
20 points (100.0% liked)

United Kingdom

6476 readers
375 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS