19
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2026
19 points (73.2% liked)
Interesting Shares
2583 readers
21 users here now
Fascinating articles, captivating images, satisfying videos, interesting projects, stunning research and more.
Share something you find incredibly interesting.
Prefix must be included in the title!
Mandatory prefixes for posts
It helps to see at glance what post is about and certain clients also offer filters that make prefixes searchable/filterable.
Note: Photon (m.lemmy.zip) frontend used for links above.
If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I did not deny that they feel better. On the contrary, my point was exactly that they do feel better. And that it doesn't matter.
If you have a cancer, and shaman healing makes you feel better, you'll still die.
The scientific protocol allows to determine what is the source of the feeling, for example by comparing with placebo.
Does shaman healing work better than someone doing fake shaman healing rituals? I doubt it, but bring up studies that prove me wrong and I'll be fine with it, at least to some extent.
why u bringing cancer into this? nobody's saying smoking some plant is gonna cure ur cancer. how u gonna know how people feel emotionally except to ask them?
also i think u can google: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/397594404_Shamanism_as_a_Clinical_Intervention_A_Scoping_Review shamanic healing helps with ptsd and chronic pain by literally changing ur heart rate variability and brain waves
So you're not reading what I'm writing, or not understanding it? A trial versus placebo allows you to test whether people feel better because of a practice, or just because they convinced themselves they feel better. If any dude that pretends to be a shaman has the same positive effect as an actual shaman, then shamanism is bullshit. It's as simple as it gets.
The study you linked is basically just a summary of a bunch of papers that contain extremely small sample sizes (one person for most of them), no comparison with placebo, and the conclusion is "our sources are very unreliable, people's beliefs in shamanism matter heavily for it to work, and overall we can't be sure that it works, but it could be worth looking into". It means absolutely nothing at all, if anything, it means that it's unlikely that shamanism has anymore healing properties than any other magical belief.
u asked for studies to prove u wrong & i gave u a 2025 review of 16 papers and now u move the goalposts because u don't like the results.
it's mental health. if a ritual helps someone with ptsd and literally changes their heart rate and brain waves, it's working. hrv and gamma waves don't just 'convince themselves' to change. u can't say it's 'nothing' just because it's not a pill.
Yeah, sorry, by "study" I obviously meant "proper study"
Then if they can't convince themselves, prove it by comparing with placebo. And if you can't, it's just another scam like homeopathy that goes "it works but you can't prove it through science", which is worthless.
All of this is just basic scientific protocol, I did not move anything, I said from the start that it needs to be proven scientifically.
Also, the study you linked, as I already said, concludes that it is absolutely not proof of anything, and that beliefs matter a lot it in (so people don't convince themselves, but yet their beliefs affect the results?)