36
submitted 2 weeks ago by 1984@lemmy.today to c/technology@lemmy.world

Starting with Firefox 148, which rolls out on Feb. 24, you’ll find a new AI controls section within the desktop browser settings. It provides a single place to block current and future generative AI features in Firefox.

They actually listened to the community, thats very nice.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MagnificentSteiner@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 weeks ago

That's all well and good that they give you the ability to turn it off. What's not changing though is that most of their focus will be on integrating AI which most people don't want. As a result the pace of other new features being tested/implemented will probably slow significantly.

[-] northernlights@lemmy.today 7 points 2 weeks ago

Plus, even if you can turn it off, the feature is still in the code, needing updates, etc., even if you don't ever use it. Literal bloat.

[-] XLE@piefed.social 1 points 2 weeks ago

At least these features won't introduce any novel security holes! /s

[-] BurgerBaron@piefed.social 2 points 2 weeks ago

HDR never, woo...

[-] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

I've already moved several family members away from Chrome, Firefox etc

Waterfox, while sharing a basic codebase, doesn't have any of this bullshit and runs like a dream.

[-] zewm@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

Also we have all seen this movie before. They launch with promises of having a choice to turn it on or off… until it’s no longer a choice.

[-] Zarxrax@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago

When did Firefox take away a choice that was previously offered?

[-] Verat@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The "open image in new tab" context menu option, off the top of my head, it has been 1000 small things with them, no 1 outrageous removal, but tons of them that didnt make big impacts yet still annoyed people who used them.

Edit: It was actually "View Image", "Open Image in New Tab" was the alternative that remained. It was removed in v88

Bugtracker Link

[-] november@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago
[-] pycorax@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

A lot of these are extensions that are folded into the main Firefox feature set, experimental features or not even related to the browser?

[-] november@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Pocket's dead now.

Like another user said, where's "open image in new tab"? (I notice you didn't reply to them.)

Remember XUL extensions and real browser themes?

Remember when you didn't need a developer account to make extensions and you could distribute them via your own website?

But of course, Firefox never takes away choices that were previously offered.

[-] pycorax@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Didn't people generally hate pocket's forced integration? Anyways I've never said that they've never removed features nor was disagreeing that what you said isn't generally true. It's just that the list posted has a lot of examples that aren't exactly a removal of a Firefox feature which hurts the argument being made. There's more than enough reasons as you mentions to make a case for it.

Like another user said, where's "open image in new tab"? (I notice you didn't reply to them.)

I don't see where's the relevance in pointing out that I didn't reply to another user's post when I'm in agreement with them.

Relax man, let's have a civil discussion that doesn't devolve into sarcasm.

[-] XLE@piefed.social 2 points 2 weeks ago

Pocket was originally an extension before Mozilla forced integration and bloated it into something it wasn't. The "something it wasn't" part, Stories, is still Firefox bloatware but without the Pocket label.

[-] catdog@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

To be fair, their reduced focus and the potential pace improvement through LLM assisted coding might cancel each other out. I wouldn't be surprized if the resulting pace change is net zero or better.

That said: I like Firefox local translations, but haven't found a use case for its other AI features yet.

[-] MysticKetchup@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

the potential pace improvement through LLM assisted coding

Have we actually seen any evidence that LLM's increase the pace of coding? Because in most of the reports I've seen there is no measurable difference even when users feel like they're faster

[-] catdog@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 weeks ago

There are some concerns but yes, development generally accelerates: https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.03156

[-] lowspeedchase@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago

we present a systematic literature review of 37 peer-reviewed studies published between January 2014 and December 2024

So they AI summarized other people's work.

Most studies are exploratory (64%) and methodologically diverse, but lack longitudinal and team-based evaluations.

And later acknowledge there are major gaps in methodology. I wouldn't be linking to this as proof of accelerated dev imho.

[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

They meant with the cleaning up after it.

[-] chunes@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago

What features do you still need after 22 years of development?

[-] Verat@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

HDR, hardware accelerated/parallelized layout/browser engine (servo)

this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2026
36 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

81605 readers
923 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS